Usercentrics (usercentrics.com) is a consent management platform that is common above all on larger websites and with publishers. It offers A/B tests on the banner, TCF 2.2 and a data layer connection — GDPR effectiveness depends on the services being wired up correctly.
Usercentrics distinguishes two product lines: the “Web CMP” for classic websites and the app CMP for mobile apps. For websites a loader script is embedded that renders the banner and manages the consent states. The actual blocking of trackers does not happen through the loader itself, but through the way the individual scripts in the page code are coupled to Usercentrics.
There are several ways to couple them: marking <script> tags with a special type and a service ID, intercepting via Google Tag Manager with the Usercentrics template, or using the consent event in your own JavaScript. In all cases: whatever is not explicitly coupled runs unchecked. A common mistake is that the marketing and development teams mix different approaches and miss tags in the process.
Usercentrics is designed for larger setups and priced accordingly — there is no permanently free tier for commercial use as with Cookiebot or Real Cookie Banner. The range of features (A/B tests, granular analytics on consent behaviour, TCF 2.2, contract management) is worthwhile above all for publishers and companies with ad monetisation.
Usercentrics does not block scripts automatically simply by being embedded. Every service has to be created in the admin interface and wired up in the code via the “Data Processing Service” mechanism or Google Consent Mode. If the connection is missing, the tracker loads independently of the banner — and then consent under Section 25(1) TDDDG is missing.
The free scan checks the delivered HTML and shows which services are embedded, whether a cookie banner is detected and whether privacy-policy and legal-notice links are present — with context for each finding. It is not a substitute for legal advice.
This text is general information to the best of our knowledge, not legal advice. For an individual case, consult a law firm specialising in IT law.